Bibliography

3 11 2010

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Girard, René. Shakespeare,los fuegos de la envidia. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1995.

Bloom, Harold.El Canon occidental. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1995.

For further reading About Individual an Social Interaction

Bains, Paul. “Subjectless Subjectivities.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. (September 1997): 511-28.

  • Balibar, Etienne. “Citizen Subject.” Cadava, Connor, Nancy: 33-57.
  • Barker, Francis. The Tremulous Private Body: Essay on Subjection. London & New York: Methuen, 1984.
  • Barthes, Roland. Roland Barthes. Trans. Richard Howard. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1977.
  • Belsey, Catherine. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London & New York: Methuen, 1985.
  • Boose, Lynda. “The Priest, the Slanderer, the Historian and the Feminist.” English Literary Renaissance 25.2: 320-40.
  • Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. “The Freudian Subject, from Politics to Ethics.” Cadava, Connor, Nancy: 61-78.
  • Burnett, Mark Thornton & John Manning (eds). New Essays on Hamlet. New York & London: AMS Press, 1994.
  • Cadava, Eduardo, Connor, Peter and Nancy, Jean-Luc. Who Comes After the Subject? New York and London: Routledge, 1991.
  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Walter W. Skeat. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1912.
  • Coddon, Karen. “Slander in an Allow’d Fool”: Twelfth Night‘s Crisis of the Aristocracy.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 33.2 (1993 Spring): 309-25.
  • Craun, E.D. Lies, Slander and Obscenity in Medieval English Literature: Pastoral Rhetoric and the Deviant Speaker. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.
  • Derrida, Jacques. “‘Eating Well,’ or the Calculation of the Subject: An Interview.” Cadava, Connor, Nancy: 96-119.
  • Empson, William. “Hamlet.” Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. David B. Pirie. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 79-136.
  • Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1983.
  • —. The History of Sexuality: The Care of the Self. Trans. Robert Hurley. London: Allen Lane, 1986.
  • Freedman, Barbara. Staging the Gaze: Postmodernism, Psychoanalysis, and Shakespearean Comedy. Ithaca & London: Cornell UP, 1991.
  • Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press, 1969 (1959).
  • Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago & London: U of Chicago P, 1980.
  • Gross, Kenneth. “Slander and Skepticism in Othello.” ELH 56.4 (1989 Winter): 819-852.
  • —. “The Rumor of Hamlet.” Raritan 14.2 (1994 Fall): 43-67.
  •  

    Futher reading about Mariage and Courtship in Elisabethan Times

    1. Anderson, Michael. Approaches to the History of the Western Family, 1500-1914. London: Macmillan, 1980.
    2. Bell, Ilona.. Elizabethan Women and the Poetry of Courtship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    3. Boose, Lynda E. “The Father and the Bride in Shakespeare.” PMLA 97 (1982): 325-47.
    4. Brooke, Christopher N. L. The Medieval Idea of Marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
    5. Carlson, Eric Josef.. Marriage and the English Reformation. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Pub., 1994.
    6. Clark, Cumberland. Shakespeare and Home Life. London: Williams & Norgate Ltd., 1935.
    7. Cook, Ann Jennalie. “The Mode of Marriage in Shakespeare’s England.” Southern Humanities Review 2 (1977): 126-32.
    8. Cook, Ann Jennalie. “Wooing and Wedding: Shakespeare’s Dramatic Distortion of the Customs of His Time.” Shakespeare’s Art from a Comparative Aspect. Ed. Wendell M. Aycock. Lubbock: Texas Tech Press, 1981.
    9. Emmison, F.G. Elizabethan Life: Morals and the Church Courts. Chelmsford: Essex County Council, 1973.
    10. Frye, Roland M. “The Teachings of Classical Puritanism on Conjugal Love.” Studies in the Renaissance 2 (1955): 148-59.
    11. Furnivall, F. J, ed. Child Marriages, Divorces, and Ratifications, Etc., in the Diocese of Chester, 1561-6. London: E.E.T.S, 1897.
    12. Haller, William, and Malleville. “The Puritan Art of Love.” Huntington Library Quarterly 5 (1942): 235-72.
    13. Ingram, Martin. Church Courts, Sex, and Marriage in England, 1570-1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    14. Klein, Joan Larsen. Daughters, Wives, and Widows: Writings by Men About Women and Marriage in England,1500-1640. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992.
    15. Laslett, Peter. Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
    16. MacDonald, Michael. Bibliography on the Family from the Fields of Theology and Philosophy. Ottawa: Vanier Institute of the Family, 1964.
    17. McSheffrey, Shannon, ed. Love and Marriage in Late Medieval London. Kalamazoo, Mich: Medieval Institute Publications, 1995.
    18. Meader, William Granville. Courtship in Shakespeare: Its Relation to the Tradition of Courtly Love. New York: King’s Crown Press, Columbia University, 1954.
    19. Powell, Chilton Latham. English Domestic Relations, 1487-1653. New York: Columbia University Press, 1917.
    20. Quaife, G. R. Wanton Wenches and Wayward Wives: Peasants and Illicit Sex in Early Seventeenth Century England. London: Croom Helm, 1979.
    21. Rowse, A.L.. Simon Forman: Sex and Society in Shakespeare’s Age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1974.
    22. Schanzer, Ernest. “The Marriage-Contracts in Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Survey 13 (1960).
    23. Stenton, Doris. “On the ‘Homily on Matrimony’.” Women: From the Greeks to the French Revolution. Ed. Susan G Bell. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1973. 218-20.
    24. Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977.

    Walker, Sue Sheridan.. Wife and Widow in Medieval England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.




    Love in Shakespeare’s Times

    27 10 2010

    Love and Marriage

    It is generally considered foolish to marry for love, although love may occur in marriage.

    Your parents and friends are better equipped than you are to look out for your best interests, being mature and experienced in the world. Let them negotiate and recommend and you’re much more likely to be happy in marriage.

    Just because a marriage is arranged doesn’t mean you’ve never met the other person. Except among the lofty nobility, most people arrange their children’s marriages with the children of neighbors and friends.

    The lower on the social scale you are, the more likely you are to have a choice in the matter.

    Courtship and Courtier

    A collection of anecdotes, debates, and advice: Castiglione’s Libro del Cortegiano (1528) was translated into sprightly English in 1561. It celebrates the high Renaissance culture–love as religion–in the court of the tiny dukedom of Urbino in northern Italy. According to Roger Ascham, Castiglione combined learning and delight in an ideal way:

    To join learning with comely exercises, Count Baldassare Castiglione, in his book Corteginano, doth trimly teach; which book advisedly read and diligently followed but one year at home in England, would do a young gentleman more good, I wiss than three years’ travel abroad in Italy.

    (More on English manners*.)

    The cult of courtly love influenced poets, musicians, and artists. Sir Thomas Wyatt’s poetry, for example, celebrates both the melancholy and joy of idealized, unattainable love. His “catch,” or round “Ah Robin,”* set to music by his comtemporary William Cornyshe debates the nature of women’s constancy. As Wyatt’s poem suggests, courtly love could easily become courtly hate.

    http://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/society/courtier.html




    Marriage in Shakespeare

    27 10 2010

    Marriage in Shakespeare

    As every Shakespearian comedy, the main plot is based on the project of a marriage,
    just as today a woman’s wedding was one of the most important days of her life. The major difference to  Elizabethan wedding customs to a modern day Western marriage is that the woman had very little, if any, choice in who her husband might be. Marriages were frequently arranged so that both families involved would benefit. Marriages would be arranged to bring prestige or wealth to the family. The children of landowners would be expected to marry to increase the size of the acreage. A surprising fact is that young men were treated in a similar way as to women! Many couples would meet for the very first time on their wedding day! This particular Elizabethan custom usually applied to the nobility – two famous examples of the tradition of arranged marriage were between the tragic Lady Jane Grey and Guildford Dudley and King Henry VIII and his fourth wife Anne of Cleves. An Elizabethan Wedding Custom for the wealthy was to present a miniature picture to the man to give some indication of what his prospective wife might look like. This custom was followed prior to the betrothal of King Henry and Anne of Cleves. The artist was Hans Holbein who chose to disregard the plain looks of Anne and capture her kind personality. This particular example of an Elizabethan wedding custom totally back fired. The King was misled, could not escape the marriage and called his wife “the Flanders Mare”. Needless to say he quickly arranged for the marriage to be dissolved in order to marry the 17 year old Catherine Howard !
    During the Elizabethan era of history women were very much ‘second class citizens’. Regardless of their social standing they were expected to marry. Single women who were thought to be witches by their neighbours… Elizabethan marriages were sometimes arranged immediately following a babies birth via a formal betrothal.

    http://www.william-shakespeare.info/elizabethan-wedding-customs.htm